This wiki has been closed because there have been no edits or logs made within the last 60 days. This wiki is now eligible for being adopted. To adopt this wiki please go to Requests for adoption and make a request. If this wiki is not adopted within 6 months it may be deleted. Note: If you are a bureaucrat on this wiki you can go to Special:ManageWiki and uncheck the "closed" box to reopen it.

User talk:TBCtableEX

From IdiotMeta
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I don't know the function and the objective of the IdiotMeta Foundation, but I think it would be better for Nocyclopedias to integrate the experienced and prestigious (or not) Uncyclomedia Foundation. I am administrator of UnMeta and I don't think there would be anyone from Uncyclomedia against a possible integration of Nocyclopedia (and its sisters). - JPLSilva (talk) 23:00, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
P.S.: I remind you that an association with the Uncyclomedia Foundation does not mean a transfer of Nocyclopedias to the server of that foundation. - JPLSilva (talk) 00:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

So this means this will integrate a higher status foundation? I'll accept it. @JPLSilva: -FireBarrier101 (talk) 00:58, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Sounds like a good idea, I sign up. --Anthony8IA (talk) 18:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Ok. Know that the association with the Uncyclomedia Foundation would result in the exclusion of this wiki "IdiotMedia". However, the Nocyclopedias are free to call the Uncyclomedia Foundation of "Idiotmedia Foundation" in their articles. To request, I need to know what differentiates Nocyclopedia and/or dÉbilepédie from other humor wikis. - JPLSilva (talk) 18:52, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Nocyclopedia (idiotpedia) is the obscure media-free encyclopedia that anyone can go insane. The wiki has idiotic humor hence the wiki's name. Débilepédie is like its French version. --Anthony8IA (talk) 19:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
P.S.: The Risapedia is also a sister project to Nocyclopedia, @JPLSilva:. --Anthony8IA (talk) 19:38, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
I want to know what Nocyclopedia has that its concurrents don't have. For example, Desciclopédia uses misinformation and lies, Wikimerda is politically incorrect, Malucopédia is nonsense and Destruipédia is offensive. - JPLSilva (talk) 19:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Oh, okay. The Nocyclopedia is a silly and crazy encyclopedia, often with funny results (or not). Or that's how I see it, I don't know what FireBarrier101 says. --Anthony8IA (talk) 20:05, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Shit, I haven't responded since, huh? Anyway, yes as the former name of the site suggests. @Anthony8IA: --FireBarrier101 (talk) 19:15, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Ok. Then, I will create the membership request soon. - JPLSilva (talk) 13:19, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Some time later

@JPLSilva: Never occurred such integration. Anthony8IA (talk) 19:07, 22 February 2021 (UTC)